This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst[PDF]) All Versions of this Article: 1525822X08317085v1 20/3/249    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Shih, T.-H. Articles by Fan, X. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta-Analysis

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ts4ex{at}virginia.edu.

	Abstract

This study meta-analyzes thirty-nine study results published within last ten years that directly compared Web and mail survey modes. Although considerable variation exists across the studies, the authors’ findings show that mail surveys have higher response rates than Web surveys in general. Two study features (i.e., population types and follow-up reminders) are shown to contribute statistically to the variation of response rate differences between Web and paper surveys in the comparative studies. College respondents appear to be more responsive to Web surveys, while some other respondents (e.g., medical doctors, school teachers, and general consumers) appear to prefer traditional mail surveys. Follow-up reminders appear to be less effective for Web survey respondents than for mail survey respondents. Other study features (i.e., implementation of random assignment of survey respondents, incentives, and publication year) are not statistically useful in accounting for the variation of response rate differences between Web and mail surveys.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?