|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Field Methods, Vol. 18, No. 4,
430-436 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X06293061
The Use of The Observer 5.0 and a Psion Handheld Computer in a Remote Fieldwork Setting
Jeremy Koster
Penn State University
References
- Alvard, M. S. 1993. Testing the "ecologically noble savage" hypothesis: Interspecific prey choice by Piro hunters of Amazonian Peru. Human Ecology21 (4): 355387.
- Eckhardt, G., and J. Waterman. 2004. Software Review: Pocket Observer 2.0. Animal Behaviour 67 (4): 805806.[CrossRef]
- Greene, P. D. 2001. Handheld computers as tools for writing and managing field data. Field Methods 13 (2): 181197.[Abstract]
- Hill, K., H.Kaplan, K. Hawkes, and A. Magdalena Hurtado. 1987. Foraging decisions among Aché hunter-gatherers: New data and implications for optimal foraging models. Ethology and Sociobiology 8 (1): 136.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ice, G. H. 2004. The advantages and limitations of computer-assisted data collection. Field Methods 15 (2): 123.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
|