Field Methods

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greene, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Field Methods, Vol. 13, No. 2, 181-197 (2001)
© 2001 SAGE Publications

Handheld Computers as Tools for Writing and Managing Field Data

Paul D. Greene

Pennsylvania State University

Pocket-size handheld computers are powerful, versatile, and rugged tools for taking down and managing ethnographic information. They can increase the speed of writing field data, allowing an ethnographer to take more detailed notes and retain information that might otherwise be lost. They also facilitate new, specifically electronic styles of data collection and management. As nonlinear inscription technologies, they can search, cross-reference, and crunch large data sets quickly in the field. Furthermore, they allow cultural data to be conceptualized and represented in many different configurations. This article specifically reviews the Sharp Wizard, Palm Pilot, Handspring Visor, and Psion.

Key Words: computer • electronic • palm • technology • writing


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
M. Sana and A. A. Weinreb
Insiders, Outsiders, and the Editing of Inconsistent Survey Data
Sociological Methods Research, May 1, 2008; 36(4): 515 - 541.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Field MethodsHome page
C. C. Gravlee, S. N. Zenk, S. Woods, Z. Rowe, and A. J. Schulz
Handheld Computers for Direct Observation of the Social and Physical Environment
Field Methods, November 1, 2006; 18(4): 382 - 397.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Field MethodsHome page
J. Koster
The Use of The Observer 5.0 and a Psion Handheld Computer in a Remote Fieldwork Setting
Field Methods, November 1, 2006; 18(4): 430 - 436.
[PDF]


Home page
Field MethodsHome page
J. H. Childs and A. Landreth
Analyzing Interviewer/Respondent Interactions while Using a Mobile Computer-Assisted Personal Interview Device
Field Methods, August 1, 2006; 18(3): 335 - 351.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Field MethodsHome page
G. H. Ice
Technological Advances in Observational Data Collection: The Advantages and LImitations of Computer-Assisted Data Collection
Field Methods, August 1, 2004; 16(3): 352 - 375.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
L. A. Fletcher, D. J. Erickson, T. L. Toomey, and A. C. Wagenaar
Handheld Computers: A Feasible Alternative to Paper Forms for Field Data Collection
Eval Rev, April 1, 2003; 27(2): 165 - 178.
[Abstract] [PDF]