Field Methods

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hathaway, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Field Methods, Vol. 15, No. 2, 161-185 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X03015002004

Active Interview Tactics in Research on Public Deviants: Exploring the Two-Cop Personas

Andrew D. Hathaway

McMaster University

Michael Atkinson

Memorial University of Newfoundland

The need to establish and maintain good rapport with interviewees is a methodological axiom supported by most social scientists. Some say we place unnecessary limits on data collection, however, when respondents' statements are simply accommodated. More innovative approaches are especially needed to account for varying roles and their narratives, as Goffman would have it, at different frontstage and backstage levels. Sociological focus on tolerable deviance—with emphasis on public deviance by those who promote wider tolerance through situated claims making—presents a research challenge of this nature. The interviews in this article with tattoo artists and drug reform advocates combine attention to rapport with more confrontational tactics, aiming to elicit from informants an array of interpretive standpoints. The authors term this technique "good cop, bad cop."

Key Words: ethnography • active interview strategies • social construction of deviance • claims making • discursive analysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Body SocietyHome page
M. Atkinson
Exploring Male Femininity in the `Crisis': Men and Cosmetic Surgery
Body Society, March 1, 2008; 14(1): 67 - 87.
[PDF]


Home page
Qualitative ResearchHome page
J. Abell, A. Locke, S. Condor, S. Gibson, and C. Stevenson
Trying similarity, doing difference: the role of interviewer self-disclosure in interview talk with young people
Qualitative Research, May 1, 2006; 6(2): 221 - 244.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Body SocietyHome page
M. Atkinson
Straightedge Bodies and Civilizing Processes
Body Society, March 1, 2006; 12(1): 69 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
V. N. Shaw
Research With Participants in Problem Experience: Challenges and Strategies
Qual Health Res, July 1, 2005; 15(6): 841 - 854.
[Abstract] [PDF]